Volume 20, Issue 1 (6-2023)
JSDP 2023, 20(1): 3-24 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
dorzadeh T, Balouchzahi N, Bakhtiyarishehri A. Improve the security of the platoon in vehicular networking. JSDP 2023; 20 (1) : 1
URL: http://jsdp.rcisp.ac.ir/article-1-1192-en.html
URL: http://jsdp.rcisp.ac.ir/article-1-1192-en.html
Sistan and Baluchestan
Abstract: (766 Views)
The growth of vehicles and the increase in urban traffic have led to the need for safe, secure and efficient Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS). Improving the efficiency of ITS needs an efficient communication system. To this end, vehicular networks have been considered as a communication infrastructure in ITS. One of the mechanisms to manage vehicles in ITS is to categorize vehicles into platoon. Platoon is proposed as a way to increase road capacity, improve safety, minimize travel time, increase fuel efficiency, reduce environmental impact, lower-traffic jams and facilitate driving. To create a platoon through autonomous cooperative driving, vehicles must be able to communicate wirelessly, which is possible through vehicular networks. Wireless communications in vehicular networks suffer from three major problems, which are: limited range of radiofrequency, high data transmission over the wireless network, as well as security problems. Using omnidirectional antennas and utilizing DSRC channels in the lower layers are the base solutions to overcome these issues but, Omnidirectional antennas spread the vulnerability to all nodes within the signal propagation range and congestion challenges in the DSRC channel intensify the collision of packets. Such issues decrease the platoon's stability and security. Recent studies on vehicular networks security have focused on presenting solutions to reduce vulnerabilities at the level of communications. However, while the security of communications has been extensively explored in previous work, the security of platoons has recently been considered by researchers. In vehicular networks, an attack can pose a threat to the security and privacy of the platoon, so the security of the platoon has received a great deal of attention. To improve the security of the platoon, the SP-VLC solution is proposed. This method uses asymmetric encryption and the transmission of information through Visible Light Communications (VLC) to overcome security challenges. In intra-platoon attacks, the attacker is a member of the platoon and has access to all keys and encrypted information, so this solution is not effective against platoon’s internal attacks. Moreover, the SP-VLC solution uses only the data flow topology of predecessor-following to transfer data. Another solution which fixes internal attack problem of SP-VLC solution is voting method. But this solution does not work well for the "predecessor-following" information flow topology because vehicles in the voting process need to receive information from at least two vehicles, while in the mentioned topology, vehicles receive information only from the vehicle in front. Therefore, the voting solution does not have the required efficiency in "predecessor-following" topology.
To overcome the challenges of the voting method, a new solution has been proposed that takes advantage of changes in the distance of each vehicle from the leader vehicle and the best speed of the malicious vehicle compared to the leader speed before the attack. Also, in order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed solution, evaluation in Bidirectional-leader (BDL) and Predecessor-leader following (PLF) topologies has been performed as a representative of other information flow topologies. The performance of the proposed solution has been evaluated using OMNeT ++, SUMO, and PLEXE tools. To measure the efficiency of the proposed method, the parameters of position error, speed error and control effort have been used. The simulation of the proposed solution shows that this study responds to spoofing attack in 0.43 seconds and to message falsification attack in 0.48 seconds.
To overcome the challenges of the voting method, a new solution has been proposed that takes advantage of changes in the distance of each vehicle from the leader vehicle and the best speed of the malicious vehicle compared to the leader speed before the attack. Also, in order to evaluate the efficiency of the proposed solution, evaluation in Bidirectional-leader (BDL) and Predecessor-leader following (PLF) topologies has been performed as a representative of other information flow topologies. The performance of the proposed solution has been evaluated using OMNeT ++, SUMO, and PLEXE tools. To measure the efficiency of the proposed method, the parameters of position error, speed error and control effort have been used. The simulation of the proposed solution shows that this study responds to spoofing attack in 0.43 seconds and to message falsification attack in 0.48 seconds.
Article number: 1
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Paper
Received: 2020/11/24 | Accepted: 2021/12/20 | Published: 2023/07/22 | ePublished: 2023/07/22
Received: 2020/11/24 | Accepted: 2021/12/20 | Published: 2023/07/22 | ePublished: 2023/07/22
References
1. [1] E. Coelingh and S. Solyom, "All aboard the robotic road train," Ieee Spectrum, vol. 49, no. 11, pp. 34-39, 2012. [DOI:10.1109/MSPEC.2012.6341202]
2. [2] A. K. Saha and D. B. Johnson, "Modeling Mobility for Vehicular Ad Hoc Networks," Proceedings of the 1st ACM International Workshop on Vehicular Ad hoc Networks , 2004, pp. 91-92. [DOI:10.1145/1023875.1023892]
3. [3] Ucar, Seyhan, Ergen, Sinem Coleri and Ozkasap, Oznur, "Security vulnerabilities of IEEE802.11 p and visible light communication based platoon," in 2016 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2016. [DOI:10.1109/VNC.2016.7835972]
4. [4] Ucar, Seyhan, Ergen, Sinem Coleri and Ozkasap, Oznur, "IEEE 802.11 p and visible light hybrid communication based secure autonomous platoon," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 8667-8681, 2018. [DOI:10.1109/TVT.2018.2840846]
5. [5] M. S. Al-Kahtani, "Survey on security attacks in Vehicular Ad hoc Networks (VANETs)," in International Conference on Signal Processing and Communication Systems, 2012. [DOI:10.1109/ICSPCS.2012.6507953]
6. [6] A. Petrillo, A. Pescapé and S. Santini, "A collaborative approach for improving the security of vehicular scenarios: The case of platooning," Computer Communications, vol. 122, pp. 59-75, 2018. [DOI:10.1016/j.comcom.2018.03.014]
7. [7] DeBruhl, Bruce, Weerakkody, Sean, Sinopoli, Bruno and Tague, Patrick, "Is your commute driving you crazy? a study of misbehavior in vehicular platoons," in Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Security & Privacy in Wireless and Mobile Networks, 2015. [DOI:10.1145/2766498.2766505]
8. [8] Kim, Yeongkwun and Kim, Injoo, "Security issues in vehicular networks," in The International Conference on Information Networking 2013 (ICOIN), 2013. [DOI:10.1109/ICOIN.2013.6496424]
9. [9] A.-S. K. Pathan, Security of self-organizing networks: MANET, WSN, WMN, VANET, CRC press, 2016. [DOI:10.1201/EBK1439819197]
10. [10] Garip, Mevlut Turker, Gursoy, Mehmet Emre, Reiher, Peter and Gerla, Mario, "Congestion attacks to autonomous cars using vehicular botnets," in NDSS Workshop on Security of Emerging Networking Technologies (SENT), San Diego, CA, 2015. [DOI:10.14722/sent.2015.23001] []
11. [11] Engoulou, Richard Gilles, Bellaïche, Martine, Pierre, Samuel and Quintero, Alejandro, "VANET security surveys," Computer Communications, vol. 44, pp. 1-13, 2014. [DOI:10.1016/j.comcom.2014.02.020]
12. [12] Alcaraz, Cristina, Lopez, Javier and Wolthusen, Stephen, "OCPP protocol: Security threats and challenges," IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 2452-2459, 2017. [DOI:10.1109/TSG.2017.2669647]
13. [13] Crepeau, Claude, Davis, Carlton R and Maheswaran, Muthucumaru, "A secure MANET routing protocol with resilience against byzantine behaviours of malicious or selfish nodes," in 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (AINAW'07), 2007. [DOI:10.1109/AINAW.2007.54]
14. [14] Hasrouny, Hamssa, Samhat, Abed Ellatif, Bassil, Carole and Laouiti, Anis, "VANet security challenges and solutions: A survey," Vehicular Communications, vol. 7, pp. 7-20, 2017. [DOI:10.1016/j.vehcom.2017.01.002]
15. [15] Jahanshahi, Niloofar and Ferrari, Riccardo MG, "Attack detection and estimation in cooperative vehicles platoons: A sliding mode observer approach," IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 21, no. 23, pp. 212-217, 2018. [DOI:10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.12.037]
16. [16] Boeira, Felipe, Asplund, Mikael and Barcellos, Marinho P, "Mitigating position falsification attacks in vehicular platooning," in 2018 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2018. [DOI:10.1109/VNC.2018.8628427]
17. [17] Mousavinejad, Eman, Yang, Fuwen, Han, Qing-Long, Qiu, Quanwei and Vlacic, Ljubo, "Cyber attack detection in platoon-based vehicular networked control systems," in 2018 IEEE 27th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), 2018. [DOI:10.1109/ISIE.2018.8433814]
18. [18] Merco, Roberto, Biron, Zoleikha Abdollahi and Pisu, Pierluigi, "Replay attack detection in a platoon of connected vehicles with cooperative adaptive cruise control," in 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), 2018. [DOI:10.23919/ACC.2018.8431538]
19. [19] Santini, Stefania, Salvi, Alessandro, Valente, Antonio Saverio, Pescapé, Antonio, Segata, Michele and Cigno, Renato Lo, "A consensus-based approach for platooning with intervehicular communications and its validation in realistic scenarios," IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 1985-1999, 2016. [DOI:10.1109/TVT.2016.2585018]
20. [20] Yang, Zheng, Shengbo, Eben Li, Jianqiang, Wang, Dongpu, Cao and Keqiang, Li, "Stability and Scalability of Homogeneous Vehicular Platoon: Study on the Influence of Information Flow Topologies," IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 17, no. 1, pp. 14 - 26, 2016. [DOI:10.1109/TITS.2015.2402153]
21. [21] S. E. Li, Y. Zheng, K. Li and J. Wang, "An Overview of Vehicular Platoon Control under the Four-Component," in 2015 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), Seoul, South Korea, 2015.
22. [22] Yang, Zheng, Shengbo, Eben Li, Jianqiang, Wang, Le, Yi Wang and Keqiang, Li, "Influence of information flow topology on closed-loop stability of vehicle platoon with rigid formation," in International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), 2014. [DOI:10.1109/ITSC.2014.6958012]
23. [23] Yongcan, Cao, Wenwu, Yu, Wei, Ren and Guanrong, Chen, "An Overview of Recent Progress in the Study of Distributed Multi-Agent Coordination," IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 427 - 438, 2013. [DOI:10.1109/TII.2012.2219061]
24. [24] Jean-Pierre, Richard, "Time-delay systems:an overview of some recent advances and open problems," Automatica, 2003. [DOI:10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00167-5]
25. [25] D, Swaroop and J.K, Hedrick, "String stability of interconnected systems," IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 349 - 357, 1996. [DOI:10.1109/9.486636]
26. [26] A. Salvi, S. Santini and A. S. Valente, "Design, analysis and performance evaluation of a third order distributed protocol for platooning in the presence of timevarying delays and switching topologies," Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, pp. 360-383, 2017. [DOI:10.1016/j.trc.2017.04.013]
27. [27] A. Botta, A. Pescape and G. Ventre, "Quality of service statistics over heterogeneous networks: Analysis and applications," European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 191, no. 3, pp. 1075-1088, 2008. [DOI:10.1016/j.ejor.2007.07.022]
28. [28] R. P. Karrer, I. Matyasovszki, A. Botta and A. Pescape, "MagNets - experiences from deploying a joint research-operational next-generation wireless access network testbed," in 2007 3rd International Conference on Testbeds and Research Infrastructure for the Development of Networks and Communities, Lake Buena Vista, FL, USA, 2007. [DOI:10.1109/TRIDENTCOM.2007.4444714]
29. [29] G. Chen and F. L. Lewis, "Leader-following control for multiple inertial agents," International Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control, vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 925-942, 2011. [DOI:10.1002/rnc.1642]
30. [30] M. Segata, S. Joerer, B. Bloessl, C. Sommer, F. Dressler and R. L. Cigno, "PLEXE: A Platooning Extension for Veins," 2014 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), 2014, pp. 53-60. [DOI:10.1109/VNC.2014.7013309]
31. [31] C. Sommer, "Veins," 2006. [Online]. Available: https://veins.car2x.org/. [Accessed 2020].
32. [32] A. Varga and R. Hornig, "An overview of the OMNeT++ simulation environment," in SIMUTools 2008 - 1st International ICST Conference on Simulation Tools and Techniques for Communications, Networks and Systems, Belgium, 2008. [DOI:10.4108/ICST.SIMUTOOLS2008.3027]
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
